Hi,What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The MSAA like helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and acceptance) of QT?
As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard choice between responsive webpage or desktop application, since you can generate both from the same QT source code. The native is native, the browser based using WebAssembly technology. (I think MSAA is not yet supported for WebAssembly till this date, but please double check this information!)
The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting for it. (Even my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is still in unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers like me to find other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.
Best regards, Imre 2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta:
I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt. Thanks for your time.QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that a single page web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that is going to be more accessible than a QT app even today. I find I stumble less with web app accessibility than I do with linux desktop accessibility, although both are usable.