Quoting Holger Levsen (2023-01-28 14:53:37) > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 02:28:30PM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > could we decouple the policy and bug severity question from the question of > > what a buildd chroot should contain, please? > [...] > > Why do people call just accepting that Priority:required packages have to be > > part of the buildd chroot the easier solution? [...] > > because people get upset if they receive bug reports with severity serious > when they don't perceive these bugs as serious. > > happened more than 9000 times already. And I asked in my mail to please "decouple the policy and bug severity question from the question of what a buildd chroot should contain" for a reason. I have no problem with downgrading the severity of these bugs to non-RC and release bookworm without explicit build dependencies on e2fsprogs. Discussing policy questions and bug severity distracts from the actual question that I find interesting. Thanks! cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature