On Monday, June 26, 2023 2:02:24 PM EDT Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 01:22:38PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > Less prone to errors than a manual process might be to watch > > > automatically where legacy startup scripts disappear anyway; it's not > > > that complicated to do. People tend to forget things. > > > > That sounds reasonable. It might be sufficient for the policy discussion > > to say that maintainers who drop sysv init scripts should file a bug > > against orphan- sysvinit-scripts with the final version of the provided > > init attached and which lists the lowest version that won't include it > > (so that orphan-sysvinit- scripts can Replaces << that version). > > Automatically is clearly not the same as "file a bug". It is not a > useful way to ask hundreds of people to do things if you can do it on > your own. Are hundreds of people dropping init scripts? I'm curious how you measure that? Scott K
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.