Re: GCC 13 stopped supporting a documented option (was Re: Bug#1050429: musl: unusable on mipsel, mips64el: mipsel-linux-gnu-gcc: unrecognised command-line option '-EL')
Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> 于2023年11月25日周六 17:48写道：
>
> Hi Thorsten
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 06:58:40PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Matthias Klose dixit:
> > >, this is not an RC issue. Please stop playing
> > > bug ping pong.
> >
> > If GCC stops supporting an option it used to support,
> > and where the GCC documentation say it’s supported,
> > it in my opinion very much is an RC bug.
>
> Thank you for purposefully not mentioning that this only applies if you
> use the bothed(?) gcc spec override to build with musl instead of glibc.
> Can you show it is broken if using the standard toolchain as asked
> by the maintainer?
>
> The gcc spec also defines which arguments are supported. So if your
> spec override does not support a particular one, then it will not work.
>
> However what I now find interesting is: the Debian gcc 12 on amd64
> got the options -muclibc, -mbionic amd -mmusl for some limited support
> for those alternative libc.
>
I can reproduce this problem. I will try to solve this problem (by git bisect
> Bastian
>
> --
> I'm frequently appalled by the low regard you Earthmen have for life.
> -- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3
>
--
YunQiang Su
Reply to: