Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
No.
You are AGAIN assuming what I am talking about.
I know the difference between a 32-bit processor and a 64-bit processor.
If you're not going to answer my question, kindly don't answer at all.
--J
> On Jan 12, 2024, at 21:40, YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> 于2024年1月13日周六 11:27写道:
>>
>> Let me try again, following up on the previous thread, but removing most of the irrelevant history.
>>
>> If I have a 32-bit Intel system that is currently supported on bookworm (currently running bullseye, but I can upgrade it), is that of use to anyone as a native build platform for 32-bit binary packages for Debian?
>>
> You are yet another person who is confused by the name "i386" vs "amd64".
> AMD64 is just the named due to that X86 is extended to X86-64 by AMD *first*.
> It means that "Intel 64" or "EM64T" is almost same with "AMD64".
>
> So, you, the Intel CPU user, should use "AMD64", if you don't clearly
> know that your
> Intel CPU is 32bit only.
>
> For more clear, for Debian, "AMD64" is equal to X86-64.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
>
> --
> YunQiang Su
Reply to: