Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

[Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org>]

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 08:23:44PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Relying on dpkg-buildflags alone cannot be sufficient.
> > 
> > I don't see any practical reason why not.
> 
> Because packages are not required to use dpkg-buildflags.

Also currently, there are about 20 lib*t64 packages in experimental
that are missing the actual library file: 

compare:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libbigwig0/filelist
with
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/libbigwig0t64/filelist

and
https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libbpp-core4/filelist
with
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/libbpp-core4t64/filelist

etc. (List below).

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

--
libbigwig0t64
libbpp-core4t64
libbpp-phyl12t64
libbpp-phyl-omics3t64
libbpp-popgen8t64
libbpp-qt2t64
libbpp-raa4t64
libbpp-seq12t64
libbpp-seq-omics3t64
libcamp0.8t64
libcapi20-3t64
libc-client2007t64-dev
libhighwayhash0t64
libmems1t64
libpari-gmp-tls8t64
librostlab3t64
libslow5-0t64
libtabixpp0t64
libtecla1t64
libterralib3t64
libxqdbm3t64