These contributions always need to be carefull reviewed before being accepted. As likely as not, they are either slightly incorrect or introducing subtle breakages in some case the submitter did not envision. This is where an expert maintainer is most needed.
Well that's your take.
My take is that when contributions to packaging "always" need a careful review, that's not virtue, that's a symptom of underlying structural problems with package management.
We should strive to fix the root cause instead of requiring maintainers to be packaging experts. That doesn't scale.
-- -- regards -- -- Matthias Urlichs
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature