[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: release notes: questions about some recent changes



On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:19:38 +0100, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:

> On 9 November 2010 17:20, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
> > Hi Javier,
> >
> > I have some comments/questions on recent changes to r-n svn:
> > - r7732: why talk about vol_id and blkid?  lenny's e2fsprogs has blkid,
> >  so the mention of vol_id seems superfluous
> 
> I thought we need to talk about both because users could change to
> using UUIDs *before* the upgrade. Reading bug reports I came to
> believe that vold_id was not available in lenny's e2fsprogs. I believe
> I did some testing in a VM to this effect.
> 
> If it's there then we could drop it, the goal of the information was
> to facilitate the change before the upgrade.
> 
blkid is in e2fsprogs in lenny and util-linux in squeeze.  Both are
essential, so it should be fine to skip vol_id.

> > - r7734 talks about a kernel upgrade, which seems irrelevant
> 
> That's true, the only upgrade needed for this would be e2fsprogrs.
> Could be removed, or e2fsprogrs could be explectely mentioned if it is
> indeed required. (see above).
> 
ok.

> > - r7735 says 'default kernel in lenny', but the change actually uses the
> >  kernel version from squeeze.  Which is it?
> 
> Commit log is wrong, it should be squeeze's
> 
ok.

> > - r7736 doesn't seem useful?
> 
> Well, it was requested in some bug report. It doesn't hurt.
> 
I think it's more confusing than helpful.  Not too important I guess.

> > - r7737 should probably be i386 and amd64 only, since that's the only
> >  archs with grub in lenny
> 
> It's currently 'fixme' so it's not printed out. In any case you are
> right, I will change that.
> 
thanks.

> > - I don't understand the TODO in the upgrading-udev section.  The
> >  preinst check was specifically changed to display a debconf screen
> >  instead of aborting, what more needs to be tested?
> 
> I wanted to test it out in a VM to see the actual behaviour just to
> ensure that we are proposing something same. If the upgrade of the
> kenel+udev (jointly, not in two steps) prevents the debconf prompt it
> might be better to suggest that instead of suggesting first kernel and
> then udev.
> 
ok.

> > - r7744 suggests downgrading udev, but that won't be possible after
> >  upgrading the rest of userspace, so I'm not sure how useful that
> >  suggestion is
> 
> Since we are suggesting first an upgrade of the kernel+udev+reboot
> before the full upgrade I think a downgrade is possible, since most of
> userspace is not yet installed.
> 
ok.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: