Hi Shengjing, On 22-04-2021 16:59, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:49 PM Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote: >> Can you propose a text? > > In the Package table in 2.2.1, adding one row. > > === > Package | Version in 10 (buster) | Version in 11 (bullseye) > Fcitx input method | 4.2.9.6 (package name is fcitx) | 5.0.5 > (package name is fcitx5) > === > > Does this work for you? I'm surprised. Sure, we can do that, but is this all? Before this bug report I had never heard of fcitx, but also I am Dutch, so ASCII is mostly fine for me. Do you think that this line conveys the information you want to deliver to the users that would be interested? In other words, do you think that every user requiring "input methods" will understand that this is a major thing? I was expecting some text describing what fcitx does and what the delta is between fcitx and fcitx5 and how users in some cases may need to actively do something if they want the "best" features when upgrading. But maybe I was misunderstanding your intent. Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature