Bug#987440: marked as done (release-notes: Mention GnuPG no longer reads ~/.gnupg/options)

["Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>]

Your message dated Sat, 8 May 2021 22:00:37 +0200
with message-id <6aa576c1-1000-970c-0106-a7ae817c0a77@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#987440: release-notes: Mention GnuPG no longer reads ~/.gnupg/options
has caused the Debian Bug report #987440,
regarding release-notes: Mention GnuPG no longer reads ~/.gnupg/options
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
987440: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
• Subject: release-notes: Mention GnuPG no longer reads ~/.gnupg/options
• From: Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
• Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:24:27 +0200
• Message-id: <1619207763@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>

Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnupg-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hello release team,

for the Debian 11 (bullseye) release notes, please consider mentioning
a change in the configuration file handling in GnuPG, related bug is
<https://bugs.debian.org/985158>. Suggested text, as in NEWS.Debian
of 2.2.27-2 uploaded a few moments ago:

  Starting with version 2.2.27-1, per-user configuration of the GnuPG
  suite has completely moved to ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf, and ~/.gnupg/options
  is no longer in use.  Please rename the file if necessary, or move
  its contents to the new location.

By the way, there is *no* code change between 2.2.27-1 (in testing) and
2.2.27-2, only the above notice and an addition to Uploaders: list. So
if you want to unblock right away, I'll certainly not object. Else I
might file an according request soon.

Kind regards,

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• To: Justin B Rye <justin.byam.rye@gmail.com>, 987440-done@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: Re: Bug#987440: release-notes: Mention GnuPG no longer reads ~/.gnupg/options
• From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
• Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 22:00:37 +0200
• Message-id: <6aa576c1-1000-970c-0106-a7ae817c0a77@debian.org>
• In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20210508192505.GA31627@jbr.me.uk>
• References: <1619207763@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <1619207763@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <[🔎] 8cd56837-d566-0329-4109-18829f95d15a@debian.org> <1619207763@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <[🔎] 20210508192505.GA31627@jbr.me.uk>

Hi,

On 08-05-2021 21:25, Justin B Rye wrote:
> We don't mean the gnupg2 (transitional) package, so maybe it should
> stick to calling it GnuPG (or GnuPG 2?) in the title as well?

pushed with s/gnupg2/GnuPG/

Thanks
Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--- End Message ---