Previously Kirk Hilliard wrote: > Does dpkg-iwj actually exist as a package? It exists as a CVS tree, not as an actual package. I expect that I some point iwj will officialy declare it a dead branch and close all its bugs. > The current dpkg package does not display symptoms of this bug. If it > would help bring them to closure, I would volunteer to step through > the bugs open against dpkg-iwj, verifying that they do not manifest > themselves in the current dpkg package. I think that Ben and I were already reasonably thorough in checking that all bugs were fixed before reassigning them. There are also a couple in there that are basically requests for a design overhaul that will probably not happen in dpkg anyway. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpHH3xEkCHtL.pgp
Description: PGP signature