Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:24:47 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200803031424.47850.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.00.0803031355550.20430@wr-linux02>
References: <20080226175431.GA10289@roeckx.be> <[🔎] 200803031123.02349.debian@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] alpine.DEB.1.00.0803031355550.20430@wr-linux02>

Hi,

On Monday 03 March 2008 13:56, Andreas Tille wrote:
> At the cost of leaving the RC bug open for at least three weeks?

It's not the only one that package has... (and we have our lenny(-test) for 
development anyway.)

Alternativly you could also fix that RC bug now and open a new, important, one 
about the other architectures being slightly wrong.


regards,
	Holger

Attachment: pgp6cKEeZKdny.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>

References:
- Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
  - From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
- Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>

Prev by Date: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
Next by Date: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
Previous by thread: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
Next by thread: Re: How important is "Architecture: any" (Was: Downloads things, ...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread