Re: Re: Where are we with SB? What's missing?

[Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>]

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:59:41AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:38:53AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> for testing I don't think it really matters here. I don't think we really want
>> a lot of *users* importing Luke's key to their setup. At that point I have the
>> feeling we might have enough data points to start enabling production setup,
>> and then fix the fallout if there's any.
>
>We just need to stop trusting the test key in the kernel package.

So, can we please make that happen?

What are we waiting on? Is there anything I can do to help? d-i alpha
5 looks very good for SB *except* we still have the test key in place
for our signed packages.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"I suspect most samba developers are already technically insane... Of
 course, since many of them are Australians, you can't tell." -- Linus Torvalds