Hello, On Fri 24 Feb 2023 at 07:51AM -04, David Bremner wrote: > Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@debian.org> writes: > >> Agreed. I'm thinking about filing an RM bug against cycle-quotes; its >> last release happened 4 years ago (although there are some non-useful >> new commits on https://github.com/emacsmirror/cycle-quotes), it fails to >> build with Emacs 28, has been blocked for 790 days, and doesn't have any >> reverse-dependencies. >> > > I would say that compared to some contexts, 4 years is not that long for > an emacs package to be static. On the other hand, cycle-quotes is not in > melpa, and it has pretty low popcon numbers, so it isn't hugely popular. It's in GNU ELPA. The fix for compatibility with recent Emacs is likely trivial. > I guess I would be inclined to just let it get removed > semi-automatically when the release team notices it has been out of > testing for a while. I think that we should leave it so that if someone wants it later, they don't have to go through NEW. It is doing no harm. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature