Re: Down to 10 ?able packages.
On Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 03:54:40PM -0600, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 03:07:45PM -0600, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
> >
> > > > > Package: smail _cut_ .vs. Replace with qmail?
> > > >
> > > > Qmail isn't even non-free and cannot even be considered as an
> > > > alternative.
> > >
> > > So you think the whole set up would be compormised if we use qmail ie
> > > consultants wouldn't be able to use it for a commercial installation?
> >
> > Nope, but you are not allowed to distribute Qmail. *Bummer*
> > Not even in Source so you could help yourself with a full
> > compiler environment. *Bummer*
>
> I thought I read on the developer list that Bruce OK'd it to go into
> debian as non-free...wouldn't this be "distribution"?
Afaik that's a qmail-source-patch package. It does not contain
a Qmail binary nor Qmail source files. Afaik it only contains
files and patches to build a .deb from the official (well, the one
and only) source file distributed by djb.
Please prove me wrong.
Regards,
Joey
--
/ Martin Schulze * joey@infodrom.north.de * 26129 Oldenburg /
/ http://home.pages.de/~joey/
/ Kernel-Patching in DOS? Selten so gelacht! -- Jochen Schoof /
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-firewall-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? e-mail to listmaster@debian.org .
Reply to: