Quoting Theppitak Karoonboonyanan (thep@linux.thai.net): > Sorry, I missed this thread, and was surprised to see new font > packages with this convention, which is different from what I read > long time ago: > > https://github.com/rbrito/fonts-policy/blob/master/fonts_policy.mdwn > > To my understanding, "fonts" is to be used with source package, > not binary. Is there any documentation I've missed? Probably not. We just haven't applied the policy draft entirely. IMHO, when there is only one binary package for a source package, I see no strong point in having the binary package using ttf-foo or otf-bar. Of course, if you want to have separate packages, then you need to find a method to name them. How about fonts-<fontname>-{otf|ttf}?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature