[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: a "fonts-recommended" metapackage?



Hi Adam,

in general, I support this idea, though I am afraid that it might turn
into a pretty subjective personal favourites list over time. But let's
see, this concept somehow works for the games-finest package as well.

Am Dienstag, den 01.01.2019, 02:05 +0100 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> The first category would be stuff like dejavu (yes, you can end up
> with it
> missing).  Perhaps cantarell which I hate but which some gnomey
> packages use
> without depending (and then look like shit).  Probably noto (see also
> second
> category).

Agreed, fonts-dejavu-core is a must. And so is fonts-cantarell, at
least for Gnome users. Do other desktops like e.g. KDE or Xfce have
their own "system UI font"?

> The next would be obviously Windows compatibles: for XP era there's
> fonts-liberation, for current MS Office crosextra.  These days, some
> webpages/etc also assume anything is Android so noto is also needed.

For the classic XP era fonts we have three packages to choose from:
fonts-liberation2 | fonts-croscore | fonts-liberation. I agree that
fonts-crosextra-* is a must, too.

What is missing in this regard is a package representing the classic 35
Postscript core fonts. Here we have a choice of fonts-urw-core35 |
fonts-texgyre and probably fonts-freefont-otf.

> For the third part, everyone wants symbols to work.  We'd also want
> emojis,
> and coloured fonts are problematic (they don't work in most
> programs).  As

I don't have a strong opinion about the third group, but I guess having
fonts-noto installed just for the sake of unicode completeness will not
hurt.

> And for the fourth -- well, it's not like any boxes you'd install
> Debian GUI
> on have less than ten gigs of disk space, so there's no reason to be
> too
> thrifty...

This is the group I worry about a bit. Everybody has his or her pet
fonts and I am not sure if wanting them promoted is a reason enough to
have them in a "core fonts" meta-package. But, again, time will tell
and probably this turns out to become a pretty usefull list of packages
and a meta-package that you would want to install on every system.

The libreoffice meta-package already has a pretty complete list (and so
has fontconfig-config), so maybe this would serve as a good starting
point.

Cheers,

 - Fabian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: