[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#97307: marked as done (gsfonts: gsfonts should 'Provide:' itself under the former name "gsfonts-x11")

Your message dated Sat, 03 Sep 2022 10:56:41 +0200
with message-id <e113ee078bbcebfc735862d9609fe7fe7b2be85d.camel@greffrath.com>
and subject line closing again with source package version
has caused the Debian Bug report #97307,
regarding gsfonts: gsfonts should 'Provide:' itself under the former name "gsfonts-x11"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
97307: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=97307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gsfonts
Version: 6.0-2
Severity: normal

Hello Thorsten,
I bugreport as you wish:
Please make the renamed gsfonts package provide "gsfonts-x11". Some
packages, e.g. j2sdk1.3 depend strongly on the (old named) package and
would be deinstalled otherwise.

Thanks,
Eduard.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux zombie 2.4.4 #3 Tue May 1 11:40:12 CEST 2001 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages gsfonts depends on:
ii  defoma         0.4.3          Debian Font Manager -- automatic font config

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 20200910-2

Once again without the epoch. Does the BTS track source or binary
package versions?

 - Fabian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: