Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures

To: 1020244@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Markus Hitter <mah@merchantsedition.com>
Subject: Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
From: fabian@greffrath.com
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:17:24 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1a5a8f686461a9f8d5987f8cf29dc921@greffrath.com>
Reply-to: fabian@greffrath.com, 1020244@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] c0809e8572c031ec1d771b969fc1a2b1@greffrath.com>
References: <[🔎] 166352550027.66548.9216272574521605454.reportbug@lilienthal.jump-ing.de> <[🔎] 166352550027.66548.9216272574521605454.reportbug@lilienthal.jump-ing.de> <[🔎] c0809e8572c031ec1d771b969fc1a2b1@greffrath.com> <[🔎] 166352550027.66548.9216272574521605454.reportbug@lilienthal.jump-ing.de>

Hi Markus,

could you please check if replacing the OTF versions of the fonts withthe TTF ones fixes the issue for you?


https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts/issues/31#issuecomment-1168348674

Thanks!

 - Fabian

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
  - From: Markus Hitter <mah@merchantsedition.com>

References:
- Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
  - From: Markus Hitter <mah@merchantsedition.com>
- Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
  - From: fabian@greffrath.com

Prev by Date: RM: gsfonts -- ROM; package now replaced/provided by fonts-urw-base35
Next by Date: Processing of python-unicodedata2_14.0.0+ds2-1_source.changes
Previous by thread: Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
Next by thread: Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread