[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1021845: s050000l.afm lost in transition from gsfonts to fonts-urw-base35



fabian@greffrath.com wrote...

> Hi,
> 
> Am 16.10.2022 21:22, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> > I will provide a README.Debian file with the next revision, explicitly
> > listing the font files with their previous and new file names and paths
> > to make migrations easier.
> 
> I have done so in the form of a debian/NEWS entry here, which is part of the
> -5 revision that I just uploaded:

Awesome!

> Given that the s050000l.afm file is *not* lost, but merely renamed and
> moved, and that this move is now properly documented, do you think we could
> close this issue again?

Certainly. Now there is something to point users to. As mentioned, this
change might still be something for the bookworm release notes,
depending on how important this is for end users or third-party packages
Debian cannot control. I'm not into font handling, so I cannot judge the
necessity for that.

Kind regards,

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: