Re: 3.0 and warning!?

[Ketil Malde <kma@networks.nera.no>]

	From bmc@visi.net Thu Apr 26 16:22:56 2001
	Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:08:14 -0400
	From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
	To: Ketil Malde <ketil@ii.uib.no>
	Cc: gcc@packages.debian.org
	Subject: Re: 3.0 and warning!?
	References: <KETIL-vk14rvc58hd.fsf@eris.bgo.nera.no>
	Mime-Version: 1.0
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
	Content-Disposition: inline
	User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
	In-Reply-To: <KETIL-vk14rvc58hd.fsf@eris.bgo.nera.no>; from ketil@ii.uib.no on Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:13:50AM +0200
	Sender: Ben Collins <bmc@visi.net>
	X-RBL-Warning: (rbl.uib.no) Mail refused, see http://www.uib.no/it/rbl/
	X-UIDL: IN>!!6PK"!~f`"!C:c!!

	On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:13:50AM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote:
	> 
	> Hi
	> 
	> Just did the usual Update/Upgrade thing, and suddenly dselect wants to
	> upgrade my gcc to 3.0.  Later on, I get this horrendous warning about
	> it.
	> 
	> I mean, all right, development snapshot and all, but surely dselect 
	> shouldn't *automatically* upgrade if it is this dangerous?!

	Which architecture?

	-- 
	 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
	/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
	`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
	 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'



i386

I think both my woody and sid machines got it.

-kzm