Bug#100535: marked as done (gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct (?) code)
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:15:44 -0700
with message-id <20010611141544.A6700@nevyn.them.org>
and subject line Bug#100535: gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2001 20:36:19 +0000
>From root@vana.vc.cvut.cz Mon Jun 11 15:36:19 2001
Return-path: <root@vana.vc.cvut.cz>
Received: from klecker.debian.org [::ffff:198.186.203.20]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 159YQ6-0008MD-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:36:18 -0500
Received: from zikova.cvut.cz [147.32.235.100]
by klecker.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 159YQ0-0007m3-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:36:12 -0700
Received: from vana.vc.cvut.cz (root@vana.vc.cvut.cz [147.32.240.58])
by zikova.cvut.cz (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id XAA23222
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:25:44 +0200
Received: from vana.vc.cvut.cz (mail@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f5BKXdXr020136
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:33:40 +0200
Received: (from root@localhost)
by vana.vc.cvut.cz (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) id f5BKXdLw020119
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:33:39 +0200
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:33:33 +0200
From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct (?) code
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20010611223333.A19897@vana.vc.cvut.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 3.0-0pre010609
Hi,
gcc_3.0-3.0-0pre010609 refuses to compile Linux kernel
because of it does not treat following code as correct
anymore. gcc-2.95.4-20010604 and gcc-3.0-20010426 both
compile this code without any complaints.
-------
#include <sys/time.h>
extern struct timeval xtime;
volatile struct timeval xtime;
-------
vana:~$ gcc -c -W -Wall xx.c
xx.c:5: conflicting types for `xtime'
xx.c:3: previous declaration of `xtime'
vana:~$ gcc-2.95 -c -W -Wall xx.c
vana:~$
Thanks,
Petr Vandrovec
vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 100535-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2001 21:16:48 +0000
>From drow@nevyn.them.org Mon Jun 11 16:16:48 2001
Return-path: <drow@nevyn.them.org>
Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com (nevyn.them.org) [::ffff:12.44.186.158]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 159Z3I-0002ee-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:16:48 -0500
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 159Z2G-0001kI-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:15:44 -0700
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:15:44 -0700
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: 100535-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#100535: gcc-3.0-20010610 refuses to compile correct
Message-ID: <20010611141544.A6700@nevyn.them.org>
References: <[🔎] 58B3BC6350B@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 58B3BC6350B@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz>; from VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:02:22PM +0000
Delivered-To: 100535-done@bugs.debian.org
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:02:22PM +0000, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 11 Jun 01 at 13:58, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > > gcc_3.0-3.0-0pre010609 refuses to compile Linux kernel
> > > because of it does not treat following code as correct
> > > anymore. gcc-2.95.4-20010604 and gcc-3.0-20010426 both
> > > compile this code without any complaints.
> > >
> > > -------
> > > #include <sys/time.h>
> > >
> > > extern struct timeval xtime;
> > >
> > > volatile struct timeval xtime;
> > > -------
> >
> > I'd call that a kernel bug. The extern definition is substantially
> > worse than useless without the volatile keyword present in it!
>
> Alan Cox just told me that he applied my patch to kernel, so gcc
> maintainer can just close this bug. Or can I do that myself?
You can - just mail to <bug>-done. I did it, though.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team
Reply to: