Re: gcc-3.0 packages in incoming
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> here we go ... The packages are in incoming, built for i386, hppa
> patch checked, libgcc symlink corrected.
>
> known issues:
>
> - doxygen segfaults generating the libstdc++-v3 docs (1.3.6 worked
> ok). results in an empty html_user dir.
>
> - the subreg-byte patch applies, but misses the two texi files (moved
> to the doc subdir). the patch applies with exit status 0, however
> correcting the dir reveals two rejects in these files.
>
> The source tarball is the upstream tarball.
Do we really need the doxygen part anyway? It's not compilable on Alpha
unless we use gcc-3.0 anyway (and even then, it's untested...it's that bad
C++ problem with 2.95.x that kept it from working from what I can tell).
C
Reply to: