[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#26436: marked as done ([done with gcc-2.96] please recompile with -fhonor-std)



Your message dated Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:01:00 +0100
with message-id <20011217210100.GA3190@wiggy.net>
and subject line reopenning bug 26028 with working email address
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 1998 18:38:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 27008 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1998 18:38:02 -0000
Received: from pc135a.wi.leidenuniv.nl (wichert@132.229.132.182)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 5 Sep 1998 18:38:02 -0000
Received: (from wichert@localhost)
	by pc135a.wi.leidenuniv.nl (8.9.1a/8.9.1/Debian/wiggy) id UAA15118;
	Sat, 5 Sep 1998 20:38:01 +0200
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1998 20:38:01 +0200
Message-Id: <199809051838.UAA15118@pc135a.wi.leidenuniv.nl>
From: <wichert@wiggy.ml.org>
Subject: libstdc++2.9: please recompile with -fhonor-std
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.6

Package: libstdc++2.9
Version: 2.91.56-1

Looking at /usr/doc/g++/NEWS.gz namespace support is now finally in egcs,
but the libstdc++ has been compiled without -fhonor-std, so it still does
not work.

Please recompile libstdc++, so I can finally port some stuff written
in msvc to Linux.

Wichert.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0
Kernel Version: Linux pc135a 2.0.33 #2 Fri May 22 20:39:06 CEST 1998 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages libstdc++2.9 depends on:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 26436-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 21:01:02 +0000
>From wichert@wiggy.net Mon Dec 17 15:01:02 2001
Return-path: <wichert@wiggy.net>
Received: from cabal.xs4all.nl (mx1.wiggy.net) [213.84.101.140] ([qLGD+lE/m38ryQRBMH+Zy6Mr8ueQ7Nry])
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16G4sf-0003zC-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 15:01:02 -0600
Received: from wichert by mx1.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16G4se-0001JF-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:01:00 +0100
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:01:00 +0100
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
To: Adam Lazur <zal@debian.org>
Cc: 26436-done@bugs.debian.org, 26028-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: reopenning bug 26028 with working email address
Message-ID: <20011217210100.GA3190@wiggy.net>
References: <20011217200559.GD10241@clustermonkey.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011217200559.GD10241@clustermonkey.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Delivered-To: 26436-done@bugs.debian.org

Previously Adam Lazur wrote:
> Wichert, I've taken the liberty of reopenning bug #26028 under a working
> email address. (bugs 24783 and 26436 also seem to still use your old
> address... I didn't migrate those though)

26436 is fixed with g++-3, 26028 seems to be fixed. I haven't run into
27783 anymore, but then again I haven't been reading much usenet lately

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |



Reply to: