[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#169024: marked as done (libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 after apt-get upgrade today from unstable included incorrect symlink?)



Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:34:01 +0100
with message-id <15830.15161.932899.69317@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line fixed in libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2002 01:51:58 +0000
>From ravenhall@kracked.com Wed Nov 13 19:51:56 2002
Return-path: <ravenhall@kracked.com>
Received: from (taelon) [65.200.107.60] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18C9Af-0005xv-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:51:53 -0600
Received: from taelon ([127.0.0.1] helo=kracked.com)
	by taelon with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18C99s-0001Z7-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:51:04 -0600
Message-ID: <[🔎] 3DD30179.4010108@kracked.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:50:49 -0600
From: Ravenhall <ravenhall@kracked.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913 Debian/1.1-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org,  submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 after apt-get upgrade today from unstable
 included incorrect symlink?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libstdc++3
Version: 1:3.0.4-13

After running a dist-upgrade today from unstable, several programs 
(including apt-cache, apt-get, and mozilla) would give the following 
error when attempting to launch them from a console:

error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot 
open shared object file: No such file or directory

I checked out /usr/lib, and found that /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 
indeed did not exist. I guesstimated from the existing symlinks that 
this should be linked to /usr/lib/libstdc++-3libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so. I 
created the link with (as root):
ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++-3libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so 
/usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3

  This then allowed me to use my programs as normal.
There IS a similar link in /usr/lib, namely:

/usr/lib/libstdc++libc6.2-2.so.3, linked to libstdc++-3libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so

as well as:
/usr/lib/libstdc++libc6.2-2.a.3, linked to
libstdc++-3libc6.2-2-2.10.0.a

  Is it possible that these symlinks were typos? It appears that 
libstdc++ in both of these links should have been written as libstdc++- 
so I believe that these are typos.

  I include the pertinent portion of my sources.list file, as I am using 
several unofficial 'cutting-edge' unstable sources:


#real unstable Debian
deb ftp://ftp.index.hu/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
deb ftp://ftp.arnes.si/packages/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
deb-src ftp://ftp.arnes.si/packages/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib

#main sid sources
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
deb http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian-non-US/ unstable/non-US main contrib 
non-free
deb http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian-non-US/ unstable/non-US main contrib 
non-free

I want this bug report to get to the correct maintainer, so I am mailing 
it to the debian-user mailing list as well as the bug submission email.
If someone has upgraded recently and has this problem, they will have to 
correct the symlinks before any apt functions will work.

Thanks,
  Nathan Waddell


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169024-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2002 12:34:19 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sat Nov 16 06:34:16 2002
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18D29Q-0001f8-00; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 06:34:16 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22220
	for <169024-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:34:02 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id gAGCY2I03926;
	Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:34:02 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15830.15161.932899.69317@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:34:01 +0100
To: 169024-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2-15
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 169024-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 



Reply to: