Bug#211469: marked as done (Missing symlink in libgcc1)
Your message dated Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:04:16 -0700
with message-id <20030921200416.GA21355@cyberhqz.com>
and subject line this isn't a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2003 22:28:34 +0000
>From schultmc@amellus.com Wed Sep 17 17:28:29 2003
Return-path: <schultmc@amellus.com>
Received: from blackangus.speedycow.net (mx1.amellus.net) [216.37.46.138]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19zkmi-0007M6-00; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:28:28 -0500
Received: from cartman.hq.amellus.com (pcp969536pcs.lwrnce01.in.comcast.net [68.58.139.203])
by mx1.amellus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 077D9BA000B; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:26:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: by cartman.hq.amellus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4A63C8C7E; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:27:49 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Schultheiss <schultmc@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Missing symlink in libgcc1
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:27:49 -0500
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20030917222749.4A63C8C7E@cartman.hq.amellus.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libgcc1
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre3
Severity: important
libgcc1 package installs /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 but does not establish a
symlink /lib/libgcc_s.so to /lib/libgcc_s.so.1. This causes an app that
tries to link with libgcc_s with "-lgcc_s" to fail. Here is an example:
ld -share -soname libevl.so.1 -o libevl.so evl_log_write.os facreg.os
formatrec.os posix1.os posix2.os posix_evlsup.os syslogat.os
query/q.tab.os query/lex.qq.os query/normalize.os query/evaluate.os
query/qopt.os template/bvfmt.os template/lex.tt.os template/serial.os
template/template.os template/tmplfmt.os template/tmplmgmt.os
template/tt.tab.os util/evl_common.os util/evl_list.os
util/fmtbuf.os util/format.os util/scanner.os -lc -lgcc_s
ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
If the symlink libgcc_s.so is created and ldconfig is run again, above
command links just fine.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cartman.hq.amellus.com 2.4.21-1-k7 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:23:16 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages libgcc1 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 211469-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 20:04:19 +0000
>From rmurray@cyberhqz.com Sun Sep 21 15:04:17 2003
Return-path: <rmurray@cyberhqz.com>
Received: from h24-77-96-253.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.77.96.253]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1ARN-00070s-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:04:17 -0500
Received: from cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com [192.168.0.2])
by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80E054004
for <211469-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A5A361B96F6; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:04:16 -0700
From: Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org>
To: 211469-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: this isn't a bug
Message-ID: <20030921200416.GA21355@cyberhqz.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 211469-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=4.0
tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
> Your ld command is incorrect.
> No, really. Do not ever, for any reason, use ld to build shared
> libraries. Use GCC.
> Then gcc will do the right thing with -lc, -lgcc_s, and the appropriate
> CRT files - that shared library is missing crti.o and crtn.o for
> instance, which could cause problems with constructors.
This isn't a bug in the gcc packaging, but in the way this library is
being built, so I'm closing this bug.
Reply to: