Bug#442279: marked as done (gcc-4.2: parameter '-std=gnu99' is ignored)
Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:56:46 +0200
with message-id <18155.4526.397262.447565@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line gcc-4.2: parameter '-std=gnu99' is ignored
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.2
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: normal
The Line
gcc -c -O3 -m32 -std=gnu99 -I [INCLUDEDIR] -funsigned-bitfields -Wall -Wsystem-headers -Winline -ffreestanding -fno-stack-protector -o /[...]/out.o /[...]/in.c
causes the following warning:
In file included from /[...]/in.c:34:
/[...]/inc/system.h:16: warning: C99 inline functions are not supported; using GNU89
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages gcc-4.2 depends on:
ii binutils 2.18-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-4.2 4.2.1-4 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-4.2-base 4.2.1-4 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.6.1-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.2.1-4 GCC support library
ii libgomp1 4.2.1-4 GCC OpenMP (GOMP) support library
Versions of packages gcc-4.2 recommends:
ii libc6-dev 2.6.1-1 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libmudflap0-4.2-dev 4.2.1-4 GCC mudflap support libraries (dev
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
not a bug, use -fgnu89-inline or C99 inline functions.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: