[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#528944: marked as done (gcc-4.3: Regression: running make in kernel source gives "internal compiler error: Illegal instruction")



Your message dated Sat, 16 May 2009 19:23:37 +0200
with message-id <4A0EF699.10709@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#528944: gcc-4.3: Regression: running make in kernel source gives "internal compiler error: Illegal instruction"
has caused the Debian Bug report #528944,
regarding gcc-4.3: Regression: running make in kernel source gives "internal compiler error: Illegal instruction"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
528944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.3-10
Severity: importan

Running make in kernel source (here 2.6.29.1, 2.6.30-rc(5|6) on ppc gives:

  HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
scripts/basic/fixdep.c: In function 'is_defined_config':
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:399: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions.
make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 1
make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2

4.3.3-7 went fine. others not testet. Can't test amd64 yet, because there
4.3.3-9 is latest which runs fine

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-rc5-bilbo (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages gcc-4.3 depends on:
ii  binutils                      2.19.1-1   The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp-4.3                       4.3.3-10   The GNU C preprocessor
ii  gcc-4.3-base                  4.3.3-10    The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6                         2.9-12     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                       1:4.4.0-4  GCC support library

Versions of packages gcc-4.3 recommends:
ii  libc6-dev                     2.9-12     GNU C Library: Development Librari

Versions of packages gcc-4.3 suggests:
ii  gcc-4.3-doc                   4.3.2.nf1-1(no description available)
pn  gcc-4.3-locales               <none>     (no description available)
ii  gcc-4.3-multilib              4.3.3-10   The GNU C compiler (multilib files
pn  libgcc1-dbg                   <none>     (no description available)
pn  libgomp1-dbg                  <none>     (no description available)
pn  libmudflap0-4.3-dev           <none>     (no description available)
pn  libmudflap0-dbg               <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information

-- 
  Alles was viel bedacht wird ist bedenklich!;-)
         Friedrich Nietzsche



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed in recent upload of gmp

Elimar Riesebieter schrieb:
> Package: gcc-4.3
> Version: 4.3.3-10
> Severity: importan
> 
> Running make in kernel source (here 2.6.29.1, 2.6.30-rc(5|6) on ppc gives:
> 
>   HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
> scripts/basic/fixdep.c: In function 'is_defined_config':
> scripts/basic/fixdep.c:399: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs> for instructions.
> make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 1
> make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2
> 
> 4.3.3-7 went fine. others not testet. Can't test amd64 yet, because there
> 4.3.3-9 is latest which runs fine



--- End Message ---

Reply to: