Re: [Pkg-grass-general] csh | c-shell
> Hamish> just curious about "csh | c-shell" ...
> me too
> Hamish> so should the dependancy just be c-shell?
> wait:
> Debian Weekly News - December 7th, 2004:
>
> Virtual Package Dependencies. Daniel Burrows [29]reminded other
> developers of the proper way to add a dependency (or recommendation)
> to a purely virtual package. He emphasises that it should be an OR
> dependency with a real package proposed as well so that apt-get
> doesn't install an arbitrary package that fulfils this dependency
> which may result in a lot of packages that neither the user nor the
> maintainer intended to get installed.
>
> 29. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/12/msg00391.html
ok thanks. 'control' file updated in GRASS CVS.
is csh really needed at all?
Hamish
Reply to: