Re: PostGIS 2.1.4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 10/17/2014 08:00 AM, Markus Wanner wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 04:47 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> The package is prevented from migrating to testing due to the
>> FTBFS on mips.
>
> Yeah. However, it's an intermittent issue. Marco Mnencari tested
> on a porter box, yesterday, and it built just fine. So I uploaded
> 2.1.4+dfsg-2 (with very few, unrelated changes) and hope it builds
> fine on mips buildd, this time. The package uploaded successfully,
> but didn't get accepted, yet. Not sure why that is, but I'd wait
> at least 24 hours...
It has since been accepted, the source-only upload preceding it was
rejected.
>> I'm tempted to just disable the tests on mips (and hurd-i386),
>> but would rather fix the cause properly.
>
> I fear a proper fix would require more memory on the buildd box or
> some such.
That's very plausible. Mapnik needed beefier buildds too to
successfully build on arm*.
The buildd admins can limit packages to buildds with at least X amount
of RAM, so asking them to retry postgis on a beefier buildd seems like
a good idea.
For the new upload the build already failed on mipsel where it
succeeded before. On mips it's still building at this time.
> (And hurd didn't ever work, so a failure there doesn't prevent
> migration to testing.)
True, and a good thing at that. I added a patch to at least make it
build on Hurd, but the tests still fail. Although it doesn't look like
the test failures are cause by the build.
Kind Regards,
Bas
- --
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=Oj/4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: