On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 09:37:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I'm very curious why those definitions are present in
> > /usr/include/linux/sockios.h on every architecture except m68k.
> > If there's a good reason, I'll make sure ifenslave won't be built
> > anymore on m68k. If there isn't, I think this bug should be reassigned
> > to libc6-dev.
>
> Even if they should be there, it's up to the kernel-headers package, not
> libc6-dev. All glibc does it copy the headers from kernel-headers
> packages. IOW, it can't be fixed from glibc.
...and Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
> > This probably does belong to libc6-dev.
>
> No, definitely not. I guess you could reassign it to
> kernel-patch-2.4.14-m68k. Of course you could also argue that it belongs
> to ifenslave for depending on kernel headers.
Well please tell me which one it is, kernel-patch-2.4.14-m68k or
kernel-headers-whatever. I noticed that kernel-headers is a virtual
package, it is provided by kernel-header-something. I guess each buildd
has their own kernel-header-something installed. Perhaps the q650
machine has an old version installed?
Anyway, ifenslave does not depend on kernel headers, unless you
(Michael) are saying that any program that uses symbolic names for
ioctl() numbers depends on kernel headers...
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.eu.org>
Attachment:
pgp75vxQCsCHW.pgp
Description: PGP signature