--- Begin Message ---
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: multiarch, required packages, and multiarch-support
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:22:43 -0700
- Message-id: <87aa05kxv0.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <E1SfNEZ-0006hN-6h@tytso-glaptop.cam.corp.google.com> (Theodore Ts'o's message of "Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:30:03 -0400")
- References: <E1SfNEZ-0006hN-6h@tytso-glaptop.cam.corp.google.com>
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> writes:
> If a required package (such as e2fslibs, which is required by e2fsprogs)
> provides multiarch support, then Lintian requires that the package have
> a dependency on the package "multiarch-support"[1].
> However, this causes debcheck to complain because you now have a
> required package depending on a package, multiarch-support, which is
> only at "standard" priority[2]
> [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/missing-pre-dependency-on-multiarch-support.html
> [2] http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=e2fsprogs
> What is the right thing to do to resolve this mutually irreconcilable
> set of complaints from either Lintian or debcheck?
multiarch-support should be priority: required. It's already a dependency
of several other priority: required packages, such as libselinux1 and
zlib1g.
That implies that in the interim you should ignore debcheck.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aa05kxv0.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu
--- End Message ---