Bug#714286: FTBFS on amd64 and ia64: Breaking multi-arch installations of (e.g.) i386 binary packages
reassign 714286 eglibc
forcemerge 713035 714286
thanks
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:44:05PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.17-5
> Severity: serious
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> There are FTBFSes of the recent version 2.17-6 for amd64 and ia64. Thus I
> cannot install any binary package from the i386 architecture because the
> versions of libc6 in i386 and amd64 are different.
>
> ~$ LANG=C sudo apt-get install libc6:i386
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libc6 : Depends: libgcc1 but it is not going to be installed
> Breaks: libc6:i386 (!= 2.17-5) but 2.17-6 is to be installed
> libc6:i386 : Breaks: libc6 (!= 2.17-6) but 2.17-5 is to be installed
> [..]
>
> I didn't find any bug report about this and also no sign in the subversion
> repository, that this issue is currently handled by the package maintainer(s).
> Therefor I open this report.
This has already been reported as bug#713035, and this is being working
on. The problem is not the package, but rather the build daemons and/or
eatmydata.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: