Bug#759218: [PATCH,Hurd] bind() fails when umask is 0000

To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#759218: [PATCH,Hurd] bind() fails when umask is 0000
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:24:37 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140825122437.GA7188@type.bordeaux.inria.fr>
Reply-to: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>, 759218@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20140825122157.GC3213@type.bordeaux.inria.fr>
References: <53B83BBB.7060303@googlemail.com> <20140824192957.GY3053@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <20140824200642.GD3053@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <20140824211149.GG3053@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <20140825120934.GB3213@type.bordeaux.inria.fr> <20140825122157.GC3213@type.bordeaux.inria.fr>

Package: libc0.3
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
Forwarded: libc-alpha@sourceware.org

Hello,

When umask is 0000, bind()'s call to __ifsock_getsockaddr() fails with
EPERM since the node was created as 0000.

Discussion happened on
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2014-08/msg00041.html

Samuel

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#759218: marked as done ([PATCH,Hurd] bind() fails when umask is 0000)
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Bug#759197: libzmq3 and libc6's 2.19-9 libpthread problems with destroying mutexes
Next by Date: Processed: tagging 759218
Previous by thread: Bug#759197: libzmq3 and libc6's 2.19-9 libpthread problems with destroying mutexes
Next by thread: Bug#759218: marked as done ([PATCH,Hurd] bind() fails when umask is 0000)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread