Hi Cyril
On 20-05-2021 08:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Having udeb-producing packages change under our feet when we're in
> the middle of unentangling the rendering mess isn't exactly nice…
I'm terribly sorry, but I thought we discussed migrating udeb generating
packages recently on IRC #d-release. I now realize that's a bit longer
ago than I though. To quote you:
[00:00:00] - {Day changed to Monday, 26 April 2021}
[22:06:17] <kibi> looks to me we have enough to fix and/or to debug on
our plate that we won't be issuing another RC in a week or so, so
freezing everyone (keeping everyone frozen) will only generate more
requests for acks; at this stage, it's likely easier to let stuff
migrate and deal with consequences afterward
I interpreted that as you are sort of fine at this moment if we migrated
the packages if they are otherwise fine. We should have agreed on a
schedule and it was on my TODO list to ask you today.
Additional note: glibc is on the list of build-essentials [1], so,
according to our freeze policy [2] it would have needed a pre-approval
already.
Paul
[1] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/essential-and-build-essential.txt
[2] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#transition
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature