On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:18:01PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Looking through the packaging docs[2], I found the syntax for dual license > > is, > > > > Files: rr/* > > Copyright: 2020 makeworld <colecmac@protonmail.com> > > License: GPL-3+ or Expat > > > > It should be "GPL-3 or MIT" there should not be a "+", since the license is > GPL-3 and not GPL-3 and beyond More for understanding here, but in the copyright documentation [1], it says, "There are many versions of the MIT license. Please use Expat instead, when it matches." Does it really matter that much if MIT or Expat is the name if the text is included as well? More want to know going forward for other packages as it seems a bit ambiguous. > Admittedly, I saw this mail after I made the change myself and pushed, > please have a look at my commits. > > I did changes that I considered sensible and uploaded to NEW. Thanks a lot > for your work on this :-) Awesome! I looked over the changes and all seem reasonable, thank you very much for your help! 1. https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ -- Micheal Waltz https://keybase.io/ecliptik GPG Fingerprint: 5F70 F2AC BD58 F580 DF15 3D1F 4FA2 70F5 CD36 71F9
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature