[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intend to revert golang-google-grpc in unstable



Hi,

On 6/25/23 11:54, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
Hi zigo,

You golang-google-grpc 1.38.0 to unstable, which was experimental previously.
It's great to see you want to work on this transition. But I fail to
see the following work to make golang-google-grpc migrate to testing.

The page:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=golang-google-grpc

shows no issue, apart from #1026139, which I just fixed. Let's see.

Besides, you drop the protoc-gen-go-grpc binary package without any
explanation.

I can't remember why I did this. What is this binary for?

Could you keep exploring this transition in experimental?

No. I would like to see etcd in unstable ASAP, and it's not my intention to delay my uploads further. If we have problems to fix in other packages that aren't being addressed, these will be auto-RM at some point, and that is a good thing. Let's fill RC bugs instead of reverting this upload.

There's
pseudo regression reports for experimental.
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=golang-google-grpc
Please take a look at this package before uploading to unstable. There
are many regressions for your golang-google-grpc 1.38.0 upload. (Since
the version in experimental has been cruft, so the page is blank
currently).

Let's fix whatever we see.
Please do not revert this upload.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)


Reply to: