Re: Gnome 2 summary 05/06/2002
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 04:18, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:30:15PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > file-roller2 depends on nautilus1.1 which isn't in unstable. That's why
> > > it's in experimental.
> >
> > Ah. Well, I've personally been happy with nautilus1.1. Nautilus 1.0 is
> > far too slow for my limited patience...
> >
> > So maybe we could just stick nautilus1.1 in unstable. That's a
> > judgement call on the part of the nautilus1.1 maintainer; what do you
> > think, Takuo?
>
> I'm certainly agreeable to this. Nautilus has probably been one of the
> most stable parts of Gnome2 I've used.
>
> Of course, the current revision (which I just installed today) seems to
> have forgotten to read my desktop font from gconfd, but I'm not sure
> what's up there. Others are seeing the same problem, so I wonder... This
> problem seems unreproducable by those who need to produce it though, which
> is annoying. The notion that it is in fact using the font I told it to
> has been raised, but I dismiss that as bull given that Verdana is not a
> serif font, and I'd use nothing else for a small eye-friendly proportional
> font. =p
>
the same happens to me, and I've fixed it by having the font config
applet start with the rest of gnome-session, and then everything works.
It's not because of the font, since I've tried this with many fonts, and
it works for, as soon as the font applet is run.
So seems some bug in the code, not in your fonts.
cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: