On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 15:22, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 09:29:56AM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 04:50:35PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote: > > > On Sat, 2002-07-20 at 16:33, Michael Toomim wrote: > > > > But more importantly -- why isn't this package named gnome-utils2? > > > > > > ...because some maintainers are actually sane about package naming? > > Do you think so? I just now was convinced to upload newer > > versions as gnome-utils2 to unstable. So the users can choose > > when they switch to gnome2. > > You're quite correct, Jochen. > > There is nothing sane about removing a functioning GNOME 1 system > for vapourware. Offer the choice! I'd appreciate if you didn't call Gnome2 vapourware. I find that insulting. -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part