Re: status of gnome2 transistion
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:35:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:04:31PM +0200, Christian Marillat ?crivait:
> > > If I understand correctly he want you to move sawfish and
> > > gnome-termainal in experimental with a 2 suffix and let gnome1 version
> > > in unstable.
Here I meant 'without a 2 suffix'.
> > We are still waiting for the ctte decision.
>
> We really shouldn't. Please put Gnome 2 packages without any *2 suffix
> in experimental and let's do it.
I am sorry to participate to a long discussion which seems to be
useless but I would like to point the obvious : If you upload everything
in experimental before uploading it to unstable, you simply create yet
another stage. It can be the goal of a few developers but that is not
the current debian scheme.
I can't find a good reason to keep gnome2 outside of unstable, it's
stable enough and the remaining issues are not going to be solved
without users.
Raphael: I remember reading during the DL election about creating a new debian archive level
along stable/testing/unstable. I don't remember if it was in your
platform but I am sure no decision has been made on this. So let's use
unstable as it is supposed to be.
Christophe, member of the "GNOME2 in sid" front.
> The step after (move to unstable) is another question and there's no
> need to argue about it now.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Rapha?l Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
> Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: