Re: So what do the Debian Gnome maintainers say?
- To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: So what do the Debian Gnome maintainers say?
- From: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:58:15 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87llsu578o.fsf@comlink.apc.org>
- In-reply-to: <uWN1.8jz.45@gated-at.bofh.it> (Christian Marillat's message of "Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:10:31 +0200")
- References: <uVxl.6g4.27@gated-at.bofh.it> <uVQD.6Py.11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uWjL.7vr.25@gated-at.bofh.it> <uWtm.7Jy.13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uWMN.8jz.21@gated-at.bofh.it> <uWN1.8jz.45@gated-at.bofh.it>
Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:43:29PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Months ? Who is talking about months ? If you really want to see 2.4 in
>>> testing more quicly try to find whats wrong with glib/gcc bugs, but this
>>> isn't so easy.
>>
>> So the only thing which is stopping gnome 2.2 from entering sarge is
>> glibc/gcc, upload to testing-proposed-updates then, and everything is
>> fine. (If the RM agrees, that is).
>
> I'll ask NM for that. We only need to move two packages in testing the
> control-center and gnome-terminal.
With control-center, the issue isn't glibc but gnome-pilot, right? In
sarge there is libgnome-pilot1 while sid has libgnome-pilot2. The old
gnome-pilot in sarge depends on libcapplet0 which is part of the old
control-center source package.
I haven't investigated, why the new gnome-pilot isn't ready for sarge
yet. Someone recently wrote that the problem involves a long
dependency chain, including KDE. But http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/
certainly has the answer.
So to force gnome2 into sarge, the gnome-pilot package would have to
be temporarily removed from testing (or deliberately broken). Do you
think this is acceptable to the RM?
Thanks,
Johannes
Reply to: