Second update on GNOME 2.10 schedule / status
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > 1/ GNOME 2.10 remaining uploads
> > - plus packages with interesting changes in the SVN
> Grepping for unreleased packages shows:
> bug-buddy 2.10.0-3
> control-center 1:2.10.1-7 => new upstream release 2.10.2
> eel2 2.10.1-3
> gnome-system-tools 1.4.0-2
Done, with gnome-mag, gtksourceview, and balsa.
Which leaves:
> eog 2.10.2-3 file-roller 2.10.4-3 gconf-editor 2.10.0-3
> gnome-applets 2.10.1-6 gnome-common 2.8.0-4 gnome-games 1:2.10.1-6
> gnome-print 0.37-6 gnome-session 2.10.0-8 gnome-terminal 2.10.0-3
> gnome-vfs2 2.10.1-6 gok 1.0.5-3 libgnomeui 2.10.1-2 nautilus 2.10.1-5
> totem 1.0.4-2 devhelp 0.10-5 evolution-webcal 2.2.0-2 gamin 0.1.6-1
> gdm-themes 0.4.2 gksu 1.3.4-2 gtk-smooth-engine 0.6.0.1-5
> gtodo-applet 0.1-6 libgda2 1.2.2-1 libgnomedb 1.2.1-5
> nautilus-sendto 0.3-5 tsclient 0.140-2
> gnome-media 2.10.2-1 => waiting for the GStreamer OSS -> ALSA switch
> mozilla-bonobo 0.4.2.1-2 => involved in Mozilla / C++ transition
... to be checked and maybe uploaded (if people find the time to).
Feel free to update this list if the changes are not worth it or if you
uploaded one of these.
> > 2-a/ testing migration cycle
> > Tracking of RC bugs and upgrade bugs from 2.8 to 2.10, and bug triage
> > for the remaining issues with respect to transition to testing.
> - mozilla FTBFS on a bunch of arches, and blocks epiphany-browser, and
> hence will block epiphany-extensions, yelp, mozilla-bonobo, and
> galeon
Alexander Sack has put a lot of efforts in the preparation of a mozilla
upload for unstable which should address these and permit migration of
yelp, galeon, mozilla-bonobo, and epiphany-browser + extensions.
Thanks to him!
> - gnome-system-tools might have bugs with exotic Debian configuration
> (for example hurd), and we might need to drop some of the tools it
> ships
That's still a RC, any one care to comment?
> - security issues in epiphany-browser (#327366) and libzvt2 (#329156)
#327366 is a mozilla issue, which should be addressed by the mozilla
upload I mentionned. #329156 and its clone #329156 against libvte4
downgraded to normal.
> - libgtk FHS compliance
(#330047 and #329903.)
> - build failures, have a look at:
> http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?email=lool%40dooz.org&packages=&arches=
Looks good!
Additionally, some RCs in pango1.0, evolution, evolution-data-server
were solved recently, which probably lowered a lot the RC count of
GNOME and friends.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Reply to: