Re: GNOME 2.26
- To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.26
- From: Johannes Rohr <jorohr@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:41:43 +0200
- Message-id: <87skj05a54.fsf@gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <cDR4a-444-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (Josselin Mouette's message of "Wed\, 20 May 2009 12\:20\:14 +0200")
- References: <cDPlH-1hJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <cDQUo-3QZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <cDR4a-444-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:
> Le mercredi 20 mai 2009 à 12:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
>> Le mercredi 20 mai 2009 à 10:01 +0200, Johannes Rohr a écrit :
>> > sorry for nagging, but what is the plan for GNOME 2.26?
>>
>> Unless more than one person starts working on it, it is becoming clear
>> to me that the plan is to wait for a very long time.
So the root problem seems to be that the former GNOME team has all but
disappeared / moved to the Ubuntu camp?
> Let me also add that #517768 is a blocker for large parts of GNOME 2.26
> and that we will be able to go forth only when it is fixed.
>
> If you want to help, start by reproducing this (MIME cache version 1.0
> in your home, version 1.1 in the system, using nautilus 2.26) and try to
> understand why the 1.0 cache is not simply ignored by the xdgmime code
> in glib2.0.
Reproducing a but might be something I could try, however,
understand code certains exceeds my skills. I am trained historian and
my coding skills are limited to essential bash scripting...
Thanks, well, still, keep up the good work...
Johannes
Reply to: