On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:39:38PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > This bug is for coordination purposes. I am in the process of preparing > an upload of WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc2 to experimental, but I believe that it > may require an upload of hamlib 4.6 (which will also likely need to go > to experimental first). > > The debian branch will be pushed to debian/experimental to follow DEP-14 > (https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep14/), and if the team is okay > with it, I propose switching from master -> debian/latest when the > package is ready for upload to unstable. I have built wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-1 against bookworm and tested WSJT-X running against the current version of hamlib in bookworm without any issues, so I don't think there is a requirement for this to be coordinated with an upload of hamlib. I'll do some more testing in trixie/unstable, but based on what I've seen so far, I think 2.7.0~rc2 is a candidate for an upload to unstable. Please let me know if there are any concerns. Thanks, tony
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature