Grub syntax
Hello Roland McGrath!
On Mon, 8 November 1999 at 13:31:39, you wrote:
> The big annoyance with that difference is that GRUB numbers
> the DOS partitions 0,1,2,3 while everyone else uses 1,2,3,4.
What is so annoying about an all zero based counting vs. the
IMHO clumsy half zero (drives) / half 1 (partitions) based
counting? Given the choice I would even prefer Grub syntax
over Linux syntax. (A random, not quite serious thought -
what about hd(666,42)?)
Maybe I will end up as a Grub fanatic one day. ;-)
/bye
Dirk
Reply to: