Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention
On 22/06/07 at 13:07 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, DDPOMail robot wrote:
>
> > Dear GNU Hurd Maintainers,
> >
> > The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
> > you maintain in Debian:
> >
> > gnumach:
> > This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days.
> > This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
> > to testing for more than 751 days.
> >
> > hurd:
> > This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days.
> > This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
> > to testing for more than 751 days.
> >
> > mig:
> > This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days.
> > This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
> > to testing for more than 751 days.
> >
> > This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly.
> > For more information about these mails, refer to
> > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
> >
> > We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was
> > avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't
> > actually problems), please reply to it and let us know.
>
> It could be avoided, yes.
>
> The "hurd" package does only exist for the hurd-i386 architecture,
> and such architecture does not have a testing distribution.
>
> Seems like a bug in the script used to generate the reports, for not
> taking this in account.
Hi,
It seemed easier to just ignore those 3 packages, so I just did that.
When kfreebsd-i386 joins in, and if it's not a testing arch as well,
I'll try to hack something to take that into account.
Thank you for the feedback.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: