Re: Talk about glibc locale format
[Moving back to -i18n]
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 12:35:04PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 01:15:09AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Slides are available at
> > http://people.debian.org/~barbier/talks/debconf5/glibc-locale.pdf
> > I am still polishing them, and will be glad to receive comments.
>
> page 3: remove full stop after LC_MESSAGES
> page 20: s/contaions/contains/
> s/number of digit/number of digits/
> page 24: second locale should be fi_FI not fi_FI@euro, right?
No, both are fi_FI@euro. With %n, currency_symbol is printed
whereas int_currency_symbol is printed with %i. The latter is
the international form, it is ASCII encoded so that this symbol
can be printed with any locale.
Note that fi_FI would work similarly with %i, but %n will display
garbage because its currency_symbol can not be written in
ISO-8859-1 encoding.
> page 35: s/Seconf/Second/
Thanks Jens for your feedback, all your changes have been committed.
Denis
Reply to: