[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to NMU cmap-adobe-korea1 to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

At Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:32:42 +0100,
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> The cmap-adobe-korea1 Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
> pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
> for po-debconf, namely bug number 533346 (and maybe other similar bugs).

> I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian
> i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
> for cmap-adobe-korea1 in order to fix this as well as all pending translations
> for the debconf templates.
> 
> Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-)

Although NMU is acceptable, I'd like to remove debconf templates
from cmap-adobe-* packages because these templates are related with
obsolete defoma.

I've already proposed the plan to drop defoma from Ghostscript and
to keep Chinese/Japanese/Korean characters usable on Ghostscript at
pkg-fonts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org.

> Subject: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Proposal for Ghostscript fonts (Re: Dropping	defoma hints files: current proposed	changes)
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:15:09 +0900
> Message-Id: <20100110101509.8BEE51A77FF@mail.topstudio.co.jp>

Only a few people is interested in, but unfortunately I haven't gotten
a response from Chinese fonts/Korean fonts/Ghostscript maintainers yet.

Thanks,
- -- 
Kenshi Muto
kmuto@debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
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=IU8i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: