Re: coreutils: please update translations
David Prévot wrote:
> Maybe, but is it really mandatory,
Technically yes[1], but I suspect nobody does it in practice based on the
number of existing bugs in the archive of that kind (including one in
one of my packages).
> and does it succeed to build from
> source twice in a row with “rm -f po/*.gmo” in the clean target anyway?
Yes, I tested that before. "diff" ignores deleted files.
I'll try the "touch pot with patch" way this time.
Ciao,
Jonathan
[1] policy §4.9: "clean: This must undo any effects that the build
and binary targets may have had, except that it should leave alone any
output files created in the parent directory"
Reply to: