[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#725042: marked as done (Please change DDTP translation statistics architecture to amd64)

Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:04:17 -0400
with message-id <20140827210417.GA27396@persil.tilapin.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#725042: [Debian-l10n-devel] Bug#725042: Please change DDTP translation statistics architecture to amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #725042,
regarding Please change DDTP translation statistics architecture to amd64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
725042: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725042
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: debian-i18n
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-l10n-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Dear l10n Developers,

for quite some time the most popular Debian architecture is amd64 (1).
However, the DDTP package description translation statistics (2) still focus
on i386, e.g. (3).

Please change the architecture measured to amd64 or base the statistics on a
combination of these architectures. It might help the translators to focus on 
the most popular packages.

Kind regards,
   Martin


1: http://popcon.debian.org/
2: http://ddtp.debian.net/stats/
3: http://ddtp.debian.net/stats/stats-sid.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:10:18PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On 30 September 2013 22:10, Martin Eberhard Schauer <Martin.E.Schauer@gmx.de
> >
> > Please change the architecture measured to amd64
> >
> Sounds reasonable. I've put in a one line change in the ddts-stats script,
> we'll see how that goes.

Looks like it worked.

Regards

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: